Free account2:33Deduplication
How repeated pages come out before anyone reads them, what each label means, and how to compare a removed page with the one that was kept.
NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
QME AI vendor watch
New tools and pricing, Q4 2026
23 vendors name California QMEs on their own pages. 9 say their output cites the source page. 8 publish a price.
The vendors that name QMEs, and the page we read
| Vendor | Page we read | Captured | Site change, 180 days | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DoctorMGT | California med-legal cheat sheet | 2026-09-07 | not in chart | none |
| Docura | Homepage | 2026-09-07 | not in chart | none |
| Doqtor | Homepage | 2026-09-07 | 100% | blocks AI crawlers |
| LevelShift | Record review services page | 2026-09-07 | 30% | none |
| MDpanel | QME practice management page | 2026-09-07 | 13% | none |
| MRR Health Tech | AI record review page for IMEs and QMEs | 2026-09-07 | 97% | none |
| rate-fast.com | Page for physicians | 2026-08-13 | not in chart | none |
| SecondLook Health | Homepage | 2026-09-07 | not in chart | none |
| SMARTMD | IME records review page | 2026-09-07 | not in chart | price page, blocks AI crawlers |
| United Medical Evaluators | Services page | 2026-09-07 | 57% | none |
| Work Comp Medical Services | Rates page | 2026-09-07 | not in chart | none |
| daisyBill | 2021 med-legal cheat sheet post | 2026-09-07 | not in chart | none |
| Long Health (EvalPath) | Blog post on AI chronology in California | 2026-09-07 | not in chart | none |
| Rapid Care | AB 1293 QME template page | 2026-09-07 | 100% | none |
How many vendors are behind the numbers on this page?
23. A vendor is counted for California QMEs only when it names that audience on its own commercial pages and carries page-level evidence in this study. The full pool is 364 companies, of which 90 carry that evidence.
At a glance
23Vendors counted
128Sources linked
1094Pages captured
172Reviews coded
On this page
The article
What changed in the last quarter for AI tools sold to the QME: new vendors, launches, pricing, language?
What the data says
- 23 vendors name California QMEs on their own commercial pages. 9 of them say the output cites back to the source page.
- 8 of 23 publish a price a buyer can act on without a sales call.
- Of 74 public reviews of AI vendors in this category, 2 mention accuracy or error at all.
3 of 14
named vendor pages are articles
not product pages
10 of 23
publish an llms.txt file
pulled 2026-09-06 to 2026-09-07
12 of 23
publish sitemap dates we can measure
the rest are recorded as not measured
3
block AI crawlers in robots.txt
in this audience set
What QME vendors put on their pages
The 14 QME pages named in sources split into 3 kinds. 8 are homepages, product pages or a rates page. 3 are review services pages, where the vendor sells a person or a team doing the review. 3 are articles: 2 med-legal billing cheat sheets (DoctorMGT, and a 2021 daisyBill post) and a Long Health post on AI chronology in California.
Rapid Care is the only named vendor with a page built around a California QME rule, an AB 1293 template for the record set. MDpanel is the only one selling QME practice management by name. 13 of the 14 named pages were captured on 2026-09-07 in the discovery pass, so this set is newer and thinner than the claims set.
Who is shipping
The chart counts the share of dated sitemap URLs that changed in the last 180 days. It measures the website, not the product.
share of dated sitemap URLs changed in the last 180 days
Measured from public sitemaps on 2026-09-06 to 2026-09-07. 8 vendors in this set publish no lastmod dates, so their velocity is recorded as not measured rather than as zero.
Doqtor and Rapid Care changed every dated URL, and MRR Health Tech 97%. United Medical Evaluators (57%), LevelShift (30%) and MDpanel (13%) move more slowly. The fastest-moving named site, Doqtor, also blocks AI crawlers.
Crawler blocking is highest here
3 of 23 QME vendors block AI crawlers in robots.txt (13%), the highest share of the 3 audiences in this series. Among claims vendors, it is 1 of 34 (3%). Among LNC vendors, it is 1 of 17 (6%). The named blockers are Doqtor and SMARTMD. A QME who asks an AI assistant to compare tools will get less about those vendors, because the assistant cannot read their sites.
The same set leads on llms.txt: 10 of 23 publish an llms.txt file (43%), the highest share of the 3 audiences in this series. Among claims vendors, it is 7 of 34 (21%). Among LNC vendors, it is 6 of 17 (35%). The QME market is split between vendors that want AI agents to find them and vendors that keep them out.
Prices and proof
8 of 23 QME vendors publish a price a buyer can act on without a sales call (35%), the middle share of the 3 audiences in this series. Among claims vendors, it is 9 of 34 (26%). Among LNC vendors, it is 9 of 17 (53%). SMARTMD is the named example. 9 of 23 say the output cites back to the source page (39%), the middle share of the 3 audiences in this series. Among claims vendors, it is 12 of 34 (35%). Among LNC vendors, it is 13 of 17 (76%). An uncited summary leaves the QME to find each page again before relying on it in a report.
What to watch next quarter
- Whether more vendors build pages around California rules, as Rapid Care did for AB 1293.
- Whether Doqtor and SMARTMD drop their crawler blocks.
- Whether the services firms (LevelShift, SMARTMD, United Medical Evaluators) publish what their AI does and what their reviewers do.
- Whether any of the 15 QME vendors without a public price prints one.
Methodology
This is a secondary-research study, not a survey. QME vendors were thin in our deep corpus, so most of this set comes from a targeted discovery pass on 2026-09-06 and 2026-09-07.
This article
23vendors counted
5677coded evidence rows
1094pages captured
172reviews coded
What we did
- A vendor counts for QMEs only when its own site names California QMEs or med-legal evaluations.
- Discovery-pass vendors were scraped shallowly, often 1 page. Billing and practice-management firms are in the set because they name QMEs, even where they sell no AI.
- Sitemaps, llms.txt and robots.txt were pulled live on 2026-09-06 and 2026-09-07.
What this cannot tell you
This measures what vendors publish, not what their software does. Most QME vendors have no public reviews, so this page says less about buyer experience than the claims and LNC pages do. Every count is over this vendor set on these dates. It is not a market share estimate.
Sources
128 sources. Every figure in this article traces to one of them. External links are marked nofollow and open in a new tab.
Vendor pages that name California QMEs (23)
- DoctorMGT · 2026-09-07
- Docura · 2026-09-07
- Doqtor · 2026-09-07
- LevelShift · 2026-09-07
- MDpanel · 2026-09-07
- MRR Health Tech · 2026-09-07
- rate-fast.com · 2026-08-13
- SecondLook Health · 2026-09-07
- SMARTMD · 2026-09-07
- United Medical Evaluators · 2026-09-07
- Work Comp Medical Services · 2026-09-07
- daisyBill · 2026-09-07
- Long Health (EvalPath) · 2026-09-07
- Rapid Care · 2026-09-07
Pricing pages (6)
- SMARTMD · 2026-09-07
Prices as of 7 Sep 2026.
Reviews and threads quoted (16)
- US Legal Support on google · 2025-04-03
- r/legaltech on Reddit · 2026-01-27
- r/LawFirm on Reddit · 2025-01-21
- r/WorkersComp on Reddit
Watch it in the app
3 short guides from our help center, recorded on a demo case. They play inside the app: sign in or create a free account, and the video opens at the chapter you picked. First case is free on us.
Free account2:33
Free account2:14Report studio
Draft a report from the records, check every page cite against them, edit it and sign it.
Free account2:35Medical chronology
Every medical event on its date, in order, tied to the page it came from. Filter it, search it and export it as PDF or Word.
Frequently asked
How many vendors are behind the numbers on this page?
23. A vendor is counted for California QMEs only when it names that audience on its own commercial pages and carries page-level evidence in this study. The full pool is 364 companies, of which 90 carry that evidence.
Which QME AI vendors block AI crawlers?
3 of 23, including Doqtor and SMARTMD. That is the highest share in this series: 1 of 34 claims vendors and 1 of 17 LNC vendors block them. An AI assistant cannot read a blocked site.
Do QME tools publish prices?
8 of 23 publish a price a buyer can act on without a sales call. SMARTMD is the named example, and its pricing page is in the sources.
Which QME vendor sites change most?
Doqtor and Rapid Care changed 100% of their dated sitemap URLs in 180 days and MRR Health Tech 97%. MDpanel changed 13%. 8 vendors publish no dates and are not measured.
Why were most QME pages captured in September?
QME vendors were thin in our 2026-08-13 deep scrape, so we ran a discovery pass on 2026-09-06 and 2026-09-07. 13 of the 14 named pages come from it. Those pages were read shallowly, often 1 page per site.
More in this series
- AI summarizes, the QME opines: the new reality of California med-legal reports in 2026
- What's missing from AI tools sold for QME reports
- The QME's buyer's guide to AI record review, 2026
- Every AI tool that claims to help QMEs, ranked honestly (2026)
- What the top 10% of QMEs do differently with records in 2026
- What QMEs and applicant attorneys say goes wrong with AI record summaries (with the reviews)
How Medrecords AI does this work
Medical chronology
A dated, deduplicated timeline with a citation on every entry.
Medical record Q&A
Question the whole record in plain English; every answer cited.
Verifiable AI citations
If it is not cited, it is not said.
Explore the content hub
State programs
Rules, AMA Guides edition, and MMI standards by state.
Guides
Editorial reference on report writing, MMI, and validity testing.
Conferences & events
Workers comp, claims, insurance and medical-legal conferences.
Directories
Rosters of examiners, LNCs, and expert witnesses by state.
State matrix report
All 10 verified state programs, side by side.