NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
HomeDeliverablesCited narrative
legal nurse consulting software for LNCs and testifying experts

More case reviews a week. The same standard on every one.

Legal nurse consulting software for LNCs and testifying experts: Medrecords AI reads the file and drafts the cited narrative in your format, flags the gaps and the contradictions, and maps the questions opposing counsel will ask. You form the opinion, you revise the narrative, you sign it.

Your format, your client·Gaps and contradictions flagged·Cross-examination mapped first

What you walk out with

The work product your client hired you for, drafted from the file in the format you already deliver.

The cited narrative

The clinical story of the file in your format, with the record page behind every statement, ready for your reading pass.

The gaps

Records the file implies and does not contain, treatment gaps, undated documents and visits nobody has accounted for.

The contradictions

Where the file disagrees with itself: a mechanism described two ways, a prior injury documented in one chart and absent from another.

The cross-examination

The questions the other side will build from this record, mapped before you are in the room rather than during it.

Who this is for

Your judgment, multiplied

Your clients are buying your reading of the file. That reading is the practice, and this does not do it for you or put anyone else’s name on it.

What it removes is the page-turning: 900 pages read to find the eleven that matter, the retyping, the chasing of a date across three charts. Consultants use that to take on more matters without stretching the standard, to hand attorneys a narrative that is already cited, and to keep the review fee instead of turning work away.

How the draft gets built

Three steps, each one a capability you can open and read on its own.

Step 1

Draft the cited narrative

The clinical story in your format, every statement carrying the record page it came from.

Narrative summary →
Step 2

Find what is missing

Records the file implies and does not contain, treatment gaps and undated documents, flagged before your client finds them.

Missing records →
Step 3

Rehearse the attack

The questions this record invites, and where your narrative would bend under them.

Opinion attack simulator →

You sign it. That is the point.

The narrative is defensible because you read it, revised it and signed it, and because every line opens the page it rests on. The software drafts and cites. It does not render a nursing opinion, does not testify and does not stand between you and your client.

Cited narrative: common questions

No. It drafts and cites the factual narrative so your hours go to the analysis. The clinical reasoning, the opinion, the report you sign and the relationship with the attorney all stay yours.

Yes. Send your format during onboarding and it is built into the tool. The draft arrives in your structure, not in a generic template you then rebuild.

That software drafted the factual narrative from the record, that every line links to its source page, and that you reviewed and signed it. The audit trail is part of the file.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

Ten cents a page on Self-Service with duplicates free, so a 900-page file is priced against a fraction of one hour of your time. The plans page lists every plan in numbers.

Run one matter through it. Read the narrative it drafts.

Send a real file, up to 500 pages. You get the cited narrative, the gap list and the cross-examination map back, and you judge the standard.

Test a file