NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →

Clinical Reference Laboratory (CRL) — Profile & Assessment

Clinical Reference Laboratory (CRL) publishes 2 of the 8 buying facts this rubric checks. Neither pricing nor turnaround is among them. This profile records what the company publishes about its services, maps those claims to the Content Hub evaluation rubric, and cites every source behind them. 10 of 17 facts confirmed from 4 public sources; the rest are marked unpublished.

4 sections·4 sources·Verified 2026-08-28 ✓
Disclosure
8/17 facts
01

What it does

Insurance risk-assessment lab testing (specimen collection/testing for underwriting), occupational health/DOT drug testing, electronic workflow via FormFox subsidiary; not confirmed to perform APS retrieval or summarization. Everything above is drawn from the 4 public sources cited at the foot of this page. Fields the company does not publish are marked as unpublished below rather than estimated.

Key facts

Segment

Insurance Underwriting & Payer Chart Review

Website

https://www.crlcorp.com

Founded

1979 (as Enzyme Technologies; renamed Clinical Reference Laboratory in 1983)

HQ

8405 Quivira Rd, Lenexa, KS 66215

Ownership

Privately held

Certifications

Certifications page exists (crlcorp.com/about/certification) but specific credential names not extracted in this session

Headcount

501-1,000 employees

Not publishedPricingTurnaround

Medrecords AI vs Clinical Reference Laboratory (CRL) at a glance

Same 8 rubric rows, side by side. Vendor cells repeat what Clinical Reference Laboratory (CRL) publishes; a row it has not published stays that way. Medrecords AI cells are our own published terms.

Rubric rowMedrecords AIClinical Reference Laboratory (CRL)
Processing modelAI drafts and cites; you review and sign. Every line cites its source page.Not published
Human QAYours, not ours. Output is editable and every claim links to the page it came from.Not published
Typical turnaroundMinutes to hours per fileNot published
Pricing modelPay per page, no subscription (Self-Service); annual licence for Enterprise On-PremNot published
Indicative costfrom 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page, duplicates freeNot published
Export formatsDOCX, PDF and HTML, hyperlinked back to every source page; API or SFTP deliveryNot published
Best forLaw firms, IME clinics, legal nurse consultants and small TPAsEmployment screening, insurance underwriting, occupational health/DOT testing, wellness programs
Customer satisfactionWe publish no rating of our ownNo public reviews found

Longer versions: Medrecords AI vs Clinical Reference Laboratory (CRL), head to head · Clinical Reference Laboratory (CRL) alternatives compared.

The boundary on our side does not move: the software drafts and cites; you review, you revise, you sign.

02

Evaluation criteria

Content Hub rubric2 of 8 published
○
Export formats
No formats named; the FormFox electronic workflow platform is referenced
✓
Best for
Employment screening, insurance underwriting, occupational health/DOT testing, wellness programs
✓
Customer satisfaction
No public reviews found
○
Not published
Processing model and human QA go unstated. So do indicative cost, pricing model, and typical turnaround, as across most of this market. The questions to ask instead are below.
03

Profile notes

Who it serves
Life/health insurers ("insurer services" line), employers, government agencies
Claims & platform notes
FormFox (electronic collection/chain-of-custody workflow platform)
Review summary
Not independently rated by Medrecords AI. Cited public reviews are listed under Sources; Medrecords AI assigns no star rating without verified evidence.
04

What to confirm before you sign

Clinical Reference Laboratory (CRL) publishes 2 of the 8 fields in the Content Hub rubric. Across the 19 Insurance Underwriting & Payer Chart Review vendors profiled here, the median is 4 of 8. Of the 6 it leaves unpublished, these 2 matter most.

  1. How do you charge — per page, per file, per hour, or per seat?
    Get the unit before you scope a pilot. A per-hour or per-seat quote and a per-page quote behave very differently once a file runs past 1,000 pages.
    Pricing model84% of Insurance Underwriting & Payer Chart Review vendors leave this unpublishedOurs: flat per page, no seats, no subscription
  2. What does a real 1,000-page file cost, all in?
    Ask for a worked example rather than a rate card. Duplicate pages, rush fees and monthly minimums are where the quoted rate and the final invoice separate.
    Indicative cost95% of Insurance Underwriting & Payer Chart Review vendors leave this unpublishedOurs: from 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page, duplicates free

The other 7 questions, and what all 270 profiled vendors do and do not publish, are in the evaluation guide.

Sources

How Medrecords AI does this work

Clinical Reference Laboratory works in medical-record review. Medrecords AI does this category of work as software: the record sorted, deduplicated and read in minutes, every statement cited back to its page, and you sign off on what it means.

Test it on a file you already have.
Send one real record set. You get back a cited chronology and decide for yourself whether the read holds up — no obligation either way.

Explore the Content Hub

Medrecords AIMedrecords AI

Minutes per file. Every line cited. From 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page.

Bring the hardest file from this page. Get a cited chronology and a report draft in minutes — every line traced to its source page, ready for your review and signature.

  • Minutes per file, not days
  • Every line cited to its source page
  • From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page, duplicates free — no license, no minimums
  • HIPAA-eligible · SOC 2
See pricing Book a demo

See how Medrecords AI compares with anything on this page — over a 30-minute call, side by side.

Last verified: 2026-08-15